Check out my Live Facebook Event for Prop R here....in attendance were around 21-25 people however by
doing a Live Facebook Event to date 1020 people have been able to view it.
PROP R INFO FROM ALDERMAN MEETING
Parks
Prop for Nov. 8th Ballot
Dear
Residents,
As you know
5.5 years ago, you elected myself for the 1st time to work for you.
In that time many votes have come before the board, including this one that I
must inform/ask you about today.
When
our Parks system was built Northwest Plaza was a strong source of sales tax
revenue. In other words, the money was flowing into city hall by the droves and
spending was not a concern. So if the residents of yesteryear suggested
something they would like to see in the parks, it was not really an issue to do
and they would build it. Of
those things built today we still enjoy… 2 Tennis Courts, Roller Hockey Rink,
Soccer Field, 8 Baseball Diamonds, 6 Playgrounds, 3-4 Swing Sets, 1-4 Pavilions
in each of the 6 Parks, 2 walking paths, multiple restroom facilities,
basketball, an Indoor/Outdoor Pool w/hot tub/kiddie pool and 2 slides, a large
pond/lake with a fountain, deck, swans and fishing, Golf Course, and newly renovated
and ADA
updated Community Center w/Racquetball/Wally ball courts/rental gym/rooms,
weight and cardio rooms/dry sauna/game room/basketball/volleyball/various
classes. They
built a wonderful parks system, however with such a great system eventually
comes the need for maintenance both large and small. This part may not have
been top of mind while building the parks system and a few other issues we see
popping up now here in the 21st Century. When
Northwest Plaza was lost, many needs in the parks were put on the back burner
while the city looked for ways to revive the parks revenue sources. Today we
see “The Crossings at Northwest” popping out of the ground…however the needs of
today’s shoppers are different and we will not be seeing the amount of revenue
we saw in the past from the mall with the new development, certainly it will
help, just not be enough. Some of the more recent laws enacted have made impact
on our city revenues as well. SB5 created by Sen. Eric Schmitt, is an example
of this. SB5 resulted in the city having to move from Point of Sale “A” city to
Point of Sale “B” city and we had to lay off 10 employees in our Police
Department. Certainly
when I got into office, if you recall Sherry, myself and group of residents
fought to prevent Prop S because of the wording of the prop we were concerned
that the money could be used for things other than just street repairs and it
would tie up funds for 20 years limiting what else St Ann might need and by the
time it was paid off, it would need to be done all over again. Props are not a
good idea for streets… When
we were approached with the need for Prop P, the board called for a 2nd
Committee to study the Budget of the city to determine if indeed a Prop was
needed to retain the Parks System. From Ward 2 I made sure we were well
represented with someone who understood finance and the result of the committee
was indeed that additional funds would be necessary to maintain the parks
system. You see we have a $2,000,000.00/year parks system, however revenue from
the parks department only brings in around $800,000.00 leaving the need to find
$1.2 million in ways to maintain the system yearly. Now the parks department is
considered a service, so has never been run as a profit center. In the days of
old, this worked. St Ann of today does not have the revenue sources to Maintain
nor Repair the needs of our Beautiful Parks System without additional
investment on our part. So
we brought Prop P to you right….in its original wording on the Prop it would
have done quite a bit of good towards these park issues. However, that Vote Failed.
Though money was still needed so the
board put the Prop back to you the residents with different wording, this I
personally did not like and did not vote for, but the Prop passed this time and
the wording worked not to necessarily Repair/Maintain but to ensure the Operating
Expenses of the Senior
Program, Pool and Day camp would be maintained for the next 6 years. Many of
you have questioned and demanded to know why necessary repairs in our eyes were
not afforded by the Prop…. this is why, wording in a Prop is important.
Because it is taxpayer funded the use of the tax can only be used for what is
stated on the ballot. In the 2nd form that was OPERATING EXPENSES. So now here we are today back at the
starting spot but
with a stronger financial outlook for the future of St Ann. In 2012 when we
last discussed the parks needs it equivocated to 3-4 million in needs, verified
by that 2nd committee we put in place to study the Parks budget, today
this number has increased - age, abuse and weather have added to the needs in
repair, replacement and maintenance issues for the system. Thus…we must come to
you for your decision on a 7.5 million Prop to replace the current prop… The current prop would go away and be replaced with a .41/100 Assessed Value Property
Tax
(this is only .10/100 more than we currently pay with Prop P.) But will take care
of the repair/maintenance needs,
aid in utility savings, reduce our overall interest rate and free up an
additional $100,000 from the Community Center Payment to put towards Street
maintenance. You and I must decide if we wish to correct the error
of
lack of foresight in the past, in order to ensure this beautiful parks system,
we have, can exist into the future… Or if we prefer to steadily as equipment
comes to a level of disrepair that is not safe…. eliminate
it from our parks system.
The choice of course is yours, unfortunately a
Property Tax will
be necessary to maintain/repair the Parks system into the future. Certainly not
the conclusion I would have hoped for as I despise taxes. So know that I do
not admit this need lightly and that I and the board have looked for every
other solution for the last 5.5 years to avoid this conclusion.
So if the prop passes we as a community will have
done what no others before us have done, which is think about the future needs
of the parks system and not just todays. With
a YES vote.
If the prop fails then we as a community
openly must realize that our Parks system will not be as good as it has always
been cause when items become unsafe they will be removed versus repaired and we
must accept that thought, before we vote
NO.
I wish I could come to you with
better news, but you must know by now that sometimes you may not like what I
have to say, but that I will always inform you with the truth and investigate
it thoroughly before I bring it to you… so you can make an informed opinion or
in this case vote.
Again for a
home worth $100,000.00 the approx. tax would be around $78.00 a year. We are
already paying $59.00, A yes vote would just redirect the money to repairs and
maintenance versus operating costs. The current Prop (with 3 years left) would be rescinded.
Capital Improvement Needs
Pool – $323,500.00
Parks- $4,394,000.00
Equipment – $483,300.00
Golf – $1,695,937.00
Total –
$6,896,737.00
Each Board Member
has been tasked with informing their Wards, just wanted to give ya’s a heads up
before the meetings to present this info to the public begin so you can get
your questions ready or ask them in advance. If passed 6.5 million would be
tied to the repair and maintenance needs of the Parks System only.
Remember the decision is yours to make, then we
will work with the confines of that decision. Basically you are telling the BOA
either YES you want to keep the parks as is but repaired and updated to save
tax dollars.... or you are telling the BOA to eliminate those things when they
become unsafe for public use, by a NO.
Thank you
Amy
Current St Ann Tax Rates
Composite Tax Rates: 127
- RR - 2015 | | Taxing Authority | Res. | Com. | Agr. | Per. | Man. |
---|
State of Missouri | 0.0300 | 0.0300 | 0.0300 | 0.0300 | 0.0300 | County General | 0.2060 | 0.2050 | 0.1790 | 0.2090 | 0.2090 | County Health Fund | 0.1380 | 0.1370 | 0.1200 | 0.1400 | 0.1400 | County Park Maintenance | 0.0490 | 0.0490 | 0.0430 | 0.0500 | 0.0500 | County Bond Retire | 0.0190 | 0.0190 | 0.0190 | 0.0190 | 0.0190 | Roads and Bridges | 0.1030 | 0.1030 | 0.0900 | 0.1050 | 0.1050 | St. Louis Community College | 0.2176 | 0.2176 | 0.2176 | 0.2176 | 0.2176 | Special School District | 1.2348 | 1.2348 | 1.2348 | 1.2348 | 1.2348 | Metropolitan Zoo Museum
District | 0.2777 | 0.2777 | 0.2777 | 0.2777 | 0.2777 | County Library | 0.2460 | 0.2590 | 0.2390 | 0.2250 | 0.2250 | School - Ritenour | 5.6930 | 5.6420 | 0.0000 | 5.0126 | 5.0126 | Metropolitan Sewer District | 0.0876 | 0.0876 | 0.0876 | 0.0876 | 0.0876 | Sewers - Cold Water | 0.1000 | 0.1000 | 0.0680 | 0.1000 | 0.1000 | Fire - Community | 2.0500 | 2.0500 | 0.0000 | 2.0500 | 2.0500 | City of St Ann | 0.5150 | 0.4800 | 0.0000 | 0.1930 | 0.0000 | Sheltered Workshop | 0.0880 | 0.0880 | 0.0770 | 0.0900 | 0.0900 | 11.0547 | 10.9797 | 2.6827 | 10.0413 | 9.8483 | | Additional Charges * |
---|
Commercial Surcharge | | $1.70¹ | | | | Sewer Lateral Fee | $10.00 | | | | |
|
Agr. = Agricultural | Com. = Commercial | Man.
= Manufacturing | Per. = Personal Property | Res. = Residential | |
| *
Additional charges are not calculated in the total tax rate. ¹ Per one hundred dollars
of assessed value. |
value of city in 2016 up 8 million over last year |
|
what proposed tax will bring in a year at .41 |
|
ST LOUIS COUNTY DIST 2 MUNI TAX RATES |
|
click here to download file with Ballot info and Capitol Repair Estimated
Traducido por Google Translate
Estimados Residentes, Como saben hace 5,5 años, eligió a mí mismo para la 1ª vez a trabajar para usted.
En ese momento muchos votos han llegado antes de la junta, incluyendo éste que debo informar a / que preguntar acerca de la
actualidad. • Cuando nuestro sistema de Parques fue construido Northwest Plaza era una fuente importante de ingresos
fiscales de ventas. En otras palabras, el dinero fluía hacia el ayuntamiento por las multitudes y el gasto no era una preocupación.
Así que si los residentes de antaño sugirieron algo que les gustaría ver en los parques, que no era realmente un problema
de hacer y que lo construiría. • De esas cosas construyen hoy en día todavía nos gustarán ... 2 pistas de tenis,
hockey patines de patinaje, Campo de fútbol, 8 diamantes de béisbol, 6 campos de juego, 3-4, 1-4 Juego de columpios
pabellones en cada uno de los 6 parques, 2 senderos, múltiple instalaciones de aseo, baloncesto, una piscina cubierta / al
aire libre w / bañera de hidromasaje / piscina para niños y 2 toboganes, un gran estanque / lago con una fuente, cubierta,
cisnes y la pesca, campo de golf, y recién renovado y ADA actualiza centro de la comunidad w / Racquetball / juegos de pelota
Wally / alquiler de gimnasia / habitaciones, salas de pesas y cardio / sauna seca / sala de juegos / baloncesto / voleibol
/ diversas clases. • Se construyó un sistema de parques maravilloso, sin embargo con un gran sistema de este tipo,
finalmente, viene la necesidad de mantenimiento, tanto grandes como pequeños. Esta parte puede no haber sido la parte superior
de la mente mientras que la construcción del sistema de parques y algunas otras cuestiones que vemos aparecer ahora aquí en
el siglo 21. • Cuando Northwest Plaza se perdió, muchas necesidades en los parques fueron puestos en un segundo plano,
mientras que la ciudad buscó la manera de revivir las fuentes de ingresos parques. Hoy vemos "Las Cruces de Northwest" saliendo
de la tierra ... sin embargo las necesidades de los compradores de hoy en día son diferentes y que no van a ver la cantidad
de ingresos que vimos en el pasado desde el centro comercial con el nuevo desarrollo, sin duda le ayudará , simplemente no
será suficiente. Algunas de las más recientes leyes promulgadas han hecho impacto en nuestros ingresos de la ciudad también.
SB5 creado por el senador Eric Schmitt, es un ejemplo de esto. SB5 dado lugar a la ciudad tener que moverse de Punto de Venta
"A" de la ciudad de Punto de Venta de la ciudad "B" y tuvimos que despedir a 10 empleados en nuestro departamento de policía. •
Ciertamente, cuando llegué a la oficina, si usted recuerda Sherry, yo y grupo de residentes lucharon para evitar Prop S debido
a la redacción de la hélice nos preocupaba que el dinero podría ser utilizado para otras cosas que sólo la reparación de calles
y sería atar fondos de 20 años que limitan qué otra cosa puede ser que necesite St Ann y por el tiempo que se pagó, tendría
que hacer todo de nuevo. Los apoyos no son una buena idea para las calles ... • Cuando nos acercamos a la necesidad
de Prop P, la junta pidió un segundo Comité para estudiar el presupuesto de la ciudad para determinar si es un apoyo del que
se necesitaba para mantener el Sistema de Parques. Desde la sala 2 Me aseguré de que estaban bien representados con alguien
que entiende las finanzas y el resultado de la comisión era de hecho que serían necesarios fondos adicionales para mantener
el sistema de parques. Ves que tenemos un sistema de parques / año $ 2,000,000.00, sin embargo los ingresos del departamento
de parques sólo aporta en torno a $ 800,000.00 dejando la necesidad de encontrar $ 1,2 millones en la manera de mantener el
sistema anual. Ahora el departamento de parques se considera un servicio, por lo que nunca se ha funcionado como centro de
beneficio. En los días de antaño, esto funcionó. St Ann de hoy no tiene las fuentes de ingresos para mantener ni reparar las
necesidades de nuestra hermosa Sistema de Parques y sin inversión adicional de nuestra parte. • Por lo que trajo
Prop P para que la derecha ... .en su redacción original en el Prop lo habría hecho un poco de buena hacia estas cuestiones
parque. Sin embargo, ese voto Failed. Aunque el dinero sigue siendo necesaria para que el listón puso el Prop de nuevo a usted
los residentes con una redacción diferente, esto personalmente, no me gusta y no voté por, pero la Prop pasado este tiempo
y la redacción trabajé no reparar necesariamente / Mantener sino asegurar los gastos de funcionamiento del Programa, piscina
y campo de Día se mantendrán durante los próximos 6 años. Muchos de ustedes se han preguntado y exigió saber por qué las reparaciones
necesarias en nuestros ojos no fueron practicadas por la Prop .... es por esto que, en un apoyo del texto es importante. Debido
a que es contribuyente financió el uso del impuesto sólo se puede utilizar para lo que se indica en la papeleta. En la segunda
forma que operaba GASTOS. • Así que ahora aquí estamos hoy de nuevo en el punto de partida, pero con una perspectiva
financiera más sólida para el futuro de St Ann. En 2012 pasado, cuando hablamos de los parques lo necesita ambiguo 3-4 millones
en necesidades, comprobada por dicho segundo comité hemos puesto en marcha para estudiar el presupuesto de Parques, en la
actualidad este número ha aumentado - la edad, el abuso y el clima han añadido a las necesidades en cuestiones de reparación,
reemplazo y mantenimiento del sistema. Por lo tanto ... tenemos que llegar a usted para su decisión en un 7,5 millones Prop
para reemplazar el actual prop ... • El pilar actual desaparecería y ser sustituido por un / 100 Evaluado Impuestos
0,41 Valor de la propiedad (esto es sólo .10 / 100 más de lo que actualmente paga con Prop P.) Pero nos ocuparemos de las
necesidades de reparación / mantenimiento, la ayuda en el ahorro de servicios públicos, reducir nuestra tasa de interés general
y liberar un adicional de $ 100.000 desde el Centro de la Comunidad de pago para poner hacia el mantenimiento de la calle. •
Usted y yo debemos decidir si queremos corregir el error de falta de previsión en el pasado, con el fin de asegurar que este
sistema de parques hermoso, tenemos, puede existir en el futuro ... O si preferimos constantemente a medida que el equipo
llega a una el nivel de deterioro que no es seguro .... eliminarlo de nuestro sistema de parques. La elección es suya,
por supuesto, por desgracia, un Impuesto a la Propiedad será necesario mantener / reparar el sistema de los parques en el
futuro. Desde luego, no la conclusión a la que habría esperado como Desprecio impuestos. Así que sé que yo no admitir esta
necesidad a la ligera y que yo y la junta mirado por cada otra solución para los últimos 5,5 años para evitar esta conclusión. Así
que si la hélice pasa a nosotros, como comunidad se habrá hecho lo que no hay otros antes que nos han hecho, que es pensar
en las necesidades futuras del sistema de parques y no sólo del día de hoy. Con un voto por el SÍ. Si la hélice falla,
entonces nosotros, como una comunidad abierta debe darse cuenta de que nuestro sistema de parques no será tan bueno como lo
ha sido siempre causa cuando los artículos se vuelven inseguros serán removidos frente reparado y hay que aceptar que el pensamiento,
antes de votar NO. Me gustaría poder llegar a usted con mejores noticias, pero usted debe saber a estas alturas que a veces
es posible que no gusta lo que tengo que decir, pero que siempre te informaré con la verdad e investigar a fondo antes de
llevarlo a usted ... para que pueda hacer un juicio calificado o en este caso una vez. De nuevo por una casa por valor
de $ 100.000,00 el aprox. impuesto sería de alrededor de $ 78.00 al año. Ya estamos pagando $ 59.00, Un voto de sí acaba de
redirigir el dinero para reparaciones y mantenimiento en comparación con los costos de operación. La Prop actual (con 3 años
de la izquierda) se anuló. Las necesidades de mejoras de capital Piscina - $ 323,500.00 Parks- $ 4,394,000.00 Equipo
- $ 483,300.00 Golf - $ 1,695,937.00 Total - $ 6,896,737.00 Cada miembro del Consejo
tiene la tarea de informar a sus protegidos, sólo quería dar ya es un mano a mano antes de las reuniones para presentar esta
información al público comience para que pueda obtener listas sus preguntas o pedir por adelantado. Si se aprueba 6,5 millones
estarían vinculados a las necesidades de reparación y mantenimiento de sólo el Sistema de Parques. Recuerde que la decisión es suya, a continuación, vamos a trabajar con los confines de esa decisión. Básicamente
le está diciendo al BOA SI, que desea mantener los parques, pero como es reparado y actualizado para ahorrar dinero de los
impuestos .... o le está diciendo al BOA para eliminar esas cosas cuando se convierten en peligrosos para el uso público,
mediante un NO. Gracias Amy
Parks are important for Urban Kids as some |
|
would never get as close to nature without them |
Future needs of the City include Streets and Police (thxtoES)
Below you are seeing research I did in 2014 when this conversation took place last on the Parks....
Prop P itself passed in 2012 and I believe has 3 years left. This would be replace by the new Prop should it pass.
Tonight
the board is tasked with coming together to find a way to make our
parks system work for the city. I mentioned this in my Localite letter. In this album you will find the numbers since
2000 to reference, as a picture increase them in size so you can read them better.
Though it was not the intent of the meeting, an alderman put the
repairs for livingston and wright on the table, it was a problem that
needed immediate solving for the safety of our children. The pro's and
con's were presented, another alderman put it to a vote, and another
seconded it. The vote was taken and with a 5-3 vote...the playground at
Livingston & Wright will be repaired. It had been determined that
this parks issues are with age and not vandalism and with ABC Ballpark
right next to it, in my opinion anyway...this park bares the reputation
of the city to all who see it weekly while abc ballpark is in season.
I don't pretend that there will be some tough decisions that need to
occur in our parks system. But there are many variables in the future
that are unforeseen on revenue, and many avenues available to try 1st.
Many of you have told me Parks are one of the reasons you reside in St.
Ann. Now it's time to let your elected officials know, what directions
you want us to take on your parks. or any ideas to improve the revenue
in the parks systems...Community Center, Golf Course, Pool, Parks
themselves....thx
hi guys,
just wanted to share some info i looked up in the links below when i googled
why parks are important to cities.
the links below our st ann parks and recreation facebook page link are quite informative as to why we would
not want to eliminate parks.
as to our parks facebook page, i feel it is under utilized
for instance when i 1st found this page it had very few likes
something like 24, so i took it and invited all of my st ann friends to
the page and it moved into the 200's. I would ask that all of you who
have facebook do the same and ask your friends to
share it with their st ann neighbors as well, this will help get some
of this info to the residents more frequently.
another way our cc could better utilize this page is by sharing on pages
that our community frequents, like the rock road reporter and i grew up
in st ann, if you are aware of any others great.... there is a Ritenour
Moms fb page that is good as well. and sharing
more than once would help also as people's fb pages move so quickly
sometimes you have to hit the right time for it to be seen. personally i
share on my kids pages as well to get the info further
our own city website as you know is still so hard to find anything on,
the average web user will give up looking before they get to what they
were looking for.
for those of you who have facebook the above info is likely repetitive
though i am quite sure our parks budget exceeds it's revenue, we have
been told time and time again that our parks dept and every other cities
parks dept. are not profitable and should not be.
personally i will not vote to shut down any of our parks
i would like to see our staffs become more aggressive in bringing in
events to our parks system that attract people to our city and buyers to
our businesses... this would help quite a bit
i would guess that there are other grants we could seek besides just the
ones from st louis county as well, i sent tim a link for one ofallon
used to put in a handicap playground that they got in the news with.
i would be open to privatizing our pool and/or golf course however if
the course is profitable see no reason to privatize it. for the pool
something like this
http://www.hazelwoodmo.org/
would attract people to the area and possibly rebuild the business
corridor of ashby while eliminating a huge budget item and the residents
gain vs lose out on something. White Birch Bay runs Hazelwoods pool out
of their park by hazelwood west high school.
We may need to find another company or just find a sponsor for our own
pool.
I heard our teen night went very well..............facebook sharing and
maybe having our two school districts push the pools and their events
prior to school letting out, may help this become more self sufficient.
Renee and I presented Matt with the Camera in the Parks idea 3 years
ago, to aid in cutting down on and catching vandalism in our parks. 3
yrs later we are apparently waiting for the camera's in the jail cells
to accomplish this task, according to matt
I have placed a reminder in my calendar around budget time to make sure i
remind Matt to include rate hikes in for his budget for utilities - as
we all see this yearly in our home budgets i do not see why a
professional budget would not have accounted for this
spike in pool utilities
as to why i ask for a 1yr, 5yr, 10yr projection for our parks budget
system...when a business plans their future they do not make those
decisions based off of current events....similar to our problem with the
streets and the need for the TDD....we need a long
term solution so we need to see longterm projections for the budgeted
needs of the parks to make those decisions.
as to the need for a grant to survey our parks system......just ask your
residents....the ones i have asked so far are opposed to losing any
parks and the typical response is also they are one of the reasons we
moved here.
In a dept x dept analysis of costs to our total parks system.....2014 budget
the parks 487,189 of which 78% of the cost is in labor and benefits - 378,689.00 gives them 108,500 to operate within
the pool 314,291 of which 61% of the cost is in labor and benefits -
192,541.00 gives them 121,750 to operate within pool budgeted revenue
is 87,000 leaving it 227,291 in red (privatization or sponsorship need)
golf 470,967 of which 70% of the cost is in labor and benefits -
329,467.00 gives them 141,500 to operate within golf budgeted revenue
is 359,000 leaving it 110,000 in red (need to attract events)
cc 559,552 of which 72% of the cost is in labor and benefits -
404,802.00 gives them 154,750 to operate within
the daycamp program is figured into cc
funding
senior 123,796 of which 94% of the cost is in labor and benefits - 115,796.00 gives them 8,000
to operate within
total system cost is 1,955,795 of which 73% of the costs to the parks budget is labor and benefits - 1,421,295.00
projected prop p is 300,000 and projected speed camera was 200,000 these
were both budgeted to parks prop p goes to senior 123,796 pool 314,291 -
87,000 revenue, daycamp 5000 = 356,087 so 56,087 in red to reduce over
parks, golf, cc. for next 5 years however
if all things stay the same.....when prop p ends we do have a 356,087
additional funding or revenue or sales tax or privatizing or sponsorship
or price increases, something to come up with
of course that is to break even.......reminder we have been told this system will never self maintain.
our relationship with Bud Sports is a good beginning to solution solving
just wanted to show ya's what i have reviewed so far and where my
thinking lies....shutting down parks will not save us the necessary amt
to save the system...attracting more people to town is my bet.
for sales tax increases in budget we need to attract customers to our
businesses thus if our staff activily attracts events to the cc or our
parks it will improve the parks budget needs in my opinion
this analysis of course only looks at the parks dept 2014
budget itself...........there is always the possibility in the future
if we get the TDD and increased business revenue and jail revenue and
dispatch revenue etc that some of this may be
able to feed into the rest of the general fund to support the parks
dept.......again reasoning to see a 1,5,10 year plan projected
don't forget to check out these links below
https://www.facebook.com/pages/St-Ann-Parks-and-Recreation/257800524233847
http://www.brec.org/index.cfm/page/1808/n/153
http://www.eastshorepark.org/benefits_of_parks%20tpl.pdf
https://www.planning.org/cityparks/briefingpapers/economicdevelopment.htm
https://www.planning.org/cityparks/
Amy Poelker
Alderwoman-Ward 2
Casjpoelker@msn.com 314-517-2378
Www.Facebook.com/ward2amypoelker
Land n Water Conservation Fund Grants
Matt In our next parks meeting can i see a breakdown of the profits from the golf course since 2000 as well
as the community ctr and pool. Please also breakdown actual labor n benefits cost for each of these. I also feel we need to
see these same numbers for the daycamp program and the senior program so we can see full picture of each dept of the parks
system. I am not asking for individual salaries however positions in each dept and their responsibilities would help in this
process of decision making. Thx Amy Poelker St Ann Alderwoman Ward 2 Casjpoelker@msn.com 314-517-2378
|